Athlon II X2 280 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-58
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.40
Athlon II X2 280
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.85
+113%

Athlon II X2 280 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-58 by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II X2 280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30102575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.52
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion 64no data
Power efficiency1.221.24
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)6 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II X2 280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II X2 280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II X2 280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II X2 280.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.85
Recency 4 May 2007 6 February 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 has 109.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X2 280, on the other hand, has a 112.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon II X2 280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 280 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Athlon II X2 280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Turion 64 X2 TL-58
AMD Athlon II X2 280
Athlon II X2 280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-58 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-58 or Athlon II X2 280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.