EPYC 7452 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7452 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a whopping 8281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3299 | 222 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.42 | 7.08 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad (2006−2007) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 17 May 2006 (19 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,025 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and EPYC 7452 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 23.5 |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and EPYC 7452 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and EPYC 7452. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and EPYC 7452 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and EPYC 7452. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.31 | 25.98 |
| Recency | 17 May 2006 | 7 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 155 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 has 400% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7452, on the other hand, has a 8280.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7452 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-52 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7452 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
