i9-10880H vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-52
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.31
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
8.10
+2513%

Core i9-10880H outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a whopping 2513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32981011
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Comet Lake
Power efficiency0.427.61
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date17 May 2006 (19 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 8.10
Recency 17 May 2006 2 April 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 45 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 has 45.2% lower power consumption.

i9-10880H, on the other hand, has a 2512.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.