M-5Y10a vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Aggregate performance score
Core M-5Y10a outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3079 | 2352 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | Intel Core M |
Power efficiency | 1.04 | 22.71 |
Architecture codename | Trinidad (2006−2007) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
Release date | 17 May 2006 (18 years ago) | 5 September 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 0.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
Multiplier | no data | 8 |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 50 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 1300 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FCBGA1234 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Smart Response | no data | + |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 5300 |
Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 800 MHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 2560x1600@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 11.2/12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.34 | 1.20 |
Recency | 17 May 2006 | 5 September 2014 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 4 Watt |
M-5Y10a has a 252.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.
The Core M-5Y10a is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Core M-5Y10a, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.