Celeron N3450 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-53 Turion 64 X2 TL-56 Turion 64 X2 TL-58
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Atom x5-E3940 Atom x7-E3950 Celeron N3350 Celeron N3450 Pentium N4200

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-52
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.34
Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.25
+268%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a whopping 268% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30792311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.0419.72
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date17 May 2006 (18 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data11
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 0.34
Celeron N3450 1.25
+268%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 1324
Celeron N3450 1415
+6.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 2554
Celeron N3450 3959
+55%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 1205
Celeron N3450 2576
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.34 1.25
Recency 17 May 2006 30 August 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N3450 has a 267.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 416.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Celeron N3450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
vs
Celeron M 540 Celeron M 540
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
vs
i7-620M Core i7 620M
Turion 64 X2 TL-52 Turion 64 X2 TL-52
vs
Pentium Dual T2330 Pentium Dual Core T2330
i3-330E Core i3 330E
vs
A6-9210 A6 9210
Atom x5-Z8550 Atom x5 Z8550
vs
A6-9210 A6 9210
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
vs
Phenom II X3 N870 Phenom II X3 N870
Athlon II N330 Athlon II N330
vs
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
Turion X2 RM-76 Turion X2 RM-76
vs
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
V-Series V140 V Series V140
vs
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
vs
Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 ML-44
Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-40
vs
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
vs
Turion 64 MT-40 Turion 64 MT-40
Celeron N3450 Celeron N3450
vs
Mobile Sempron M100 Mobile Sempron M100

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 11 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 152 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-52 or Celeron N3450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.