Ryzen 7 5825U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-50
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33
Ryzen 7 5825U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
11.54
+3397%

Ryzen 7 5825U outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-50 by a whopping 3397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3082681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency1.0172.81
Architecture codenameTaylor (2006)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date17 May 2006 (18 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$154no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Die size147 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors154 Million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE(1,2,3), AMD64MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 0.33
Ryzen 7 5825U 11.54
+3397%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 96
Ryzen 7 5825U 1725
+1697%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 153
Ryzen 7 5825U 6366
+4061%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 1184
Ryzen 7 5825U 11292
+854%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 11.54
Recency 17 May 2006 6 January 2022
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 7 5825U has a 3397% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 5825U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Ryzen 7 5825U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
Ryzen 7 5825U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 26 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 716 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-50 or Ryzen 7 5825U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.