Duo T2350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-50
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33
+37.5%
Core Duo T2350
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.24

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 outperforms Core Duo T2350 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30833176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Core Duo
Power efficiency1.010.73
Architecture codenameTaylor (2006)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date17 May 2006 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$154no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size147 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors154 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.262V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE(1,2,3), AMD64no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.24
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Duo T2350, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Duo T2350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Core Duo T2350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Intel Core Duo T2350
Core Duo T2350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 26 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Duo T2350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-50 or Core Duo T2350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.