Atom E680 vs Turion 64 MT-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MT-40
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.21
Atom E680
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.22
+4.8%

Atom E680 outperforms Turion 64 MT-40 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32253203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64no data
Power efficiency0.795.21
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)14 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size125 mm226 mm2
Number of transistors114 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754Intel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.22
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 4 Watt

Atom E680 has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MT-40 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-40
Turion 64 MT-40
Intel Atom E680
Atom E680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 MT-40 or Atom E680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.