Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Turion 64 ML-42
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | October 2005 (19 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
Turion 64 ML-42 has 57.1% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-42 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
