EPYC 8024P vs Turion 64 ML-37

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
ML-28 ML-30 ML-32 ML-34 ML-37 ML-40 ML-42 MT-28 MT-32 MT-34 MT-37 MT-40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8024P 8124P 8124PN 8224P 8324P 8324PN 8434P 8434PN 8534P Embedded 8124P Embedded 8224P Embedded 8434P

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-37
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.19
EPYC 8024P
2023, $409
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
11.67
+6042%

EPYC 8024P outperforms Turion 64 ML-37 by a whopping 6042% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
EPYC 8024P EPYC 8024P

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3531796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesTurion 64no data
Power efficiency0.235.47
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Siena (2023−2024)
Release dateMarch 2005 (21 years ago)18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$409

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Die size125 mm273 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors114 million8,875 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754SP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.19 11.67
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 90 Watt

Turion 64 ML-37 has 157% lower power consumption.

EPYC 8024P, on the other hand, has a 6042% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 8024P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 ML-37 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 ML-37 is a notebook processor while EPYC 8024P is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Atom E3826 Atom E3826
EPYC 8024P EPYC 8024P
vs
EPYC 7281 EPYC 7281
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Celeron N2805 Celeron N2805
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Sempron 3000+ Sempron 3000+
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Sempron 3100+ Sempron 3100+
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Ryzen 5 2500X Ryzen 5 2500X
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
Celeron N4120 N4120
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
i5-10600KF i5 10600KF
Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-37
vs
EPYC 9275F EPYC 9275F
Solo T1400 Solo T1400
vs
EPYC 7282 EPYC 7282
Celeron M 575 M 575
vs
Athlon 64 3300+ Athlon 64 3300+
Celeron M 575 M 575
vs
Athlon 64 3500+ Athlon 64 3500+
Celeron M 575 M 575
vs
Athlon 64 3500+ EE Athlon 64 3500+ EE

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion 64 ML-37 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate EPYC 8024P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 ML-37 and EPYC 8024P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.