EPYC 8324PN vs Turion 64 ML-32
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1414 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.55 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Turion 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.91 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | March 2005 (20 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,125 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 ML-32 and EPYC 8324PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.79 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-32 and EPYC 8324PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and EPYC 8324PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and EPYC 8324PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and EPYC 8324PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and EPYC 8324PN.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 32 |
| Threads | 1 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 130 Watt |
EPYC 8324PN has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 293.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Turion 64 ML-32 and AMD EPYC 8324PN. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Turion 64 ML-32 is a notebook processor while EPYC 8324PN is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
