Xeon Gold 6443N vs Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Primary details
Comparing Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | no data |
Release date | no data | 1 July 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 96 | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
Threads | 192 | 64 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | 60 MB |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 12x 71 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
Number of transistors | 78,840 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | SP5 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 195 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4400 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 4 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 96 | 32 |
Threads | 192 | 64 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 195 Watt |
Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Xeon Gold 6443N, on the other hand, has 79.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6443N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6443N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.