Ultra 9 285T vs Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Primary details
Comparing Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Arrow Lake-S (2024) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | October 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | 1851 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Threadripper PRO 7945WX has a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Ultra 9 285T, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 438.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Threadripper PRO 7945WX is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
