Xeon X3360 vs Steam Deck OLED APU
Aggregate performance score
Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Xeon X3360 by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1290 | 2133 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
Power efficiency | 29.09 | 1.51 |
Architecture codename | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) | no data |
Release date | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
Threads | 8 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.83 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | LGA775 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360 are enumerated here.
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.61 | 1.52 |
Recency | 9 November 2023 | 1 January 2008 |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Steam Deck OLED APU has a 203.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3360 in performance tests.
Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while Xeon X3360 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X3360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.