EPYC 4484PX vs Sempron 2500+
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4484PX outperforms Sempron 2500+ by a whopping 23742% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3630 | 200 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 50.91 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.21 | 25.62 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Palermo (2001−2005) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | $599 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Sempron 2500+ and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.75 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 2x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 47 °C |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 17,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 2500+ and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 754 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2500+ and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2500+ and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2500+ and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2500+ and EPYC 4484PX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.12 | 28.61 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 120 Watt |
Sempron 2500+ has 93.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 23741.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Sempron 2500+ in performance tests.
Note that Sempron 2500+ is a desktop processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
