E2-3000 vs Sempron 2500+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 2500+
2001, $80
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.12

E2-3000 outperforms Sempron 2500+ by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36563244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.081.18
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenamePalermo (2001−2005)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (25 years ago)23 May 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.75 GHz1.65 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache256 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Die size101 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors63 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FT3
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Sempron 2500+ 0.12
E2-3000 0.42
+250%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Sempron 2500+ 207
Samples: 42
E2-3000 743
+259%
Samples: 18

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 0.42
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 15 Watt

E2-3000 has a 250% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 313.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD E2-3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Sempron 2500+ in performance tests.

Note that Sempron 2500+ is a desktop processor while E2-3000 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2500+
Sempron 2500+
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate Sempron 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Sempron 2500+ and E2-3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.