Atom N435 vs Sempron 2200+
Aggregate performance score
Sempron 2200+ outperforms Atom N435 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3650 | 3671 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | 2 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 2200+ and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 2200+ and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2200+ and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2200+ and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2, DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 512 Watt |
Sempron 2200+ has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 725.8% lower power consumption.
Atom N435, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Sempron 2200+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N435 in performance tests.
Note that Sempron 2200+ is a desktop processor while Atom N435 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
