AMD EPYC 9654 vs Samsung Exynos 850

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Samsung Exynos 850
1.37

EPYC 9654 outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 5702% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20964
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesSamsungAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCortex-A55 (2019)Genoa
Release date15 May 2020 (3 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current priceno data$3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography8 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardARM Mali-G52 MP1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Samsung Exynos 850 1.37
EPYC 9654 79.49
+5702%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 5702% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Samsung Exynos 850 2110
EPYC 9654 122091
+5686%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 5686% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.37 79.49
Recency 15 May 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Samsung Exynos 850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Samsung Exynos 850 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Samsung Exynos 850
Exynos 850
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 7 votes

Rate Samsung Exynos 850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Samsung Exynos 850 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.