Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Ryzen Z2 Go

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Z2 Go
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 28 Watt
7.65
+51.8%
Xeon E3-1285L v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.04

Ryzen Z2 Go outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10321289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)no data
Power efficiency26.177.43
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameRembrandt R (2025)Broadwell-DT (2015)
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
eDRAMno data128 MB
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 680MIntel Iris Pro P6300
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.15 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Z2 Go 7.65
+51.8%
Xeon E3-1285L v4 5.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Z2 Go 12270
+51.7%
Xeon E3-1285L v4 8090

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.65 5.04
Recency 6 January 2025 2 June 2015
Chip lithography 6 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Z2 Go has a 51.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Z2 Go is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1285L v4 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
Xeon E3-1285L v4

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Z2 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 52 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Z2 Go and Xeon E3-1285L v4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.