Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen Z2 Go
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Z2 outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1241 | 1759 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) | Qualcomm Snapdragon |
| Power efficiency | 10.10 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Microsoft |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt R (2025) | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 2 October 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Z2 Go and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Z2 Go and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | W |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Z2 Go and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 680M | Qualcomm Adreno 685 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.70 | 3.45 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 2 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm |
Ryzen Z2 Go has a 94.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
