Xeon Gold 6126 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Xeon Gold 6126 by 727% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1 | 578 |
| Place by popularity | 20 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 2.77 | 5.24 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 25 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | $1,776 |
| Current price | $11150 (1.1x MSRP) | $1241 (0.7x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 6126 has 89% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
Technical specs
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 96 | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 192 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 6 MB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 96 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 384 MB | 19.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | Compute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 86 °C |
| Number of transistors | 78,840 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | sTR5 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Xeon Gold 6126 by 727% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Xeon Gold 6126 by 727% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 100.00 | 12.09 |
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 25 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 96 | 12 |
| Threads | 192 | 24 |
| Cost | $9999 | $1776 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 125 Watt |
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6126 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6126 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon Gold 6126, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
