Ryzen 5 7520U vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 1561% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1 | 1003 |
| Place by popularity | 10 | 5 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 2.77 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | no data |
| Current price | $11150 (1.1x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed Specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 96 | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 192 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 6 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 96 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 384 MB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | Compute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 78,840 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2 | LPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 1561% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 1561% in Passmark.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 1800% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 69% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 100.00 | 6.02 |
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 20 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 96 | 4 |
| Threads | 192 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 15 Watt |
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
