FX-8800P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023
96 cores / 192 threads
100.00
+5335%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 5335% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11881
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Architecture codenameStorm PeakCarrizo (2015−2018)
Release date19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)3 June 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999no data
Current price$11150 (1.1x MSRP)$515

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores964 (Quad-Core)
Threads1924
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache6 MBno data
L2 cache96 MB2048 KB
L3 cache384 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nm28 nm
Die sizeCompute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
Number of transistors78,840 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5FP4
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt12-35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2HSA 1.0
AES-NI+1
FMAno dataFMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P.

PCIe version5.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 100.00
+5335%
FX-8800P 1.84

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 5335% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 154658
+5325%
FX-8800P 2851

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 5325% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 7951
+205%
FX-8800P 2604

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 205% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 72072
+817%
FX-8800P 7860

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 817% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 21375
+406%
FX-8800P 4227

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 406% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 7.93
+51.6%
FX-8800P 12.02

FX-8800P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX by 52% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 77
+2188%
FX-8800P 3

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 2188% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 15842
+5619%
FX-8800P 277

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 5619% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 286
+249%
FX-8800P 82

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 249% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 3.4
+254%
FX-8800P 0.96

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 254% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 38.4
+1645%
FX-8800P 2.2

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 1645% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 63037
+3985%
FX-8800P 1543

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 3985% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 355
+279%
FX-8800P 94

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 279% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 268
+1170%
FX-8800P 21

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-8800P by 1170% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 100.00 1.84
Recency 19 October 2023 3 June 2015
Physical cores 96 4
Threads 192 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 12 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8800P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while FX-8800P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-8800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1138 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 94 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX or FX-8800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.