FX-7600P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023
96 cores / 192 threads
100.00
+5924%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 5924% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11937
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Kaveri
Architecture codenameStorm PeakKaveri (2014−2015)
Release date19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)4 June 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999no data
Current price$11150 (1.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores964 (Quad-Core)
Threads1924
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus supportno dataBGA (FP3)
L1 cache6 MBno data
L2 cache96 MB4096 KB
L3 cache384 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nm28 nm
Die sizeCompute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors78,840 million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5FP3
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-2133 Controller
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
FRTCno data1
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P.

PCIe version5.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 100.00
+5924%
FX-7600P 1.66

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 5924% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 157100
+5917%
FX-7600P 2611

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 5917% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 7951
+211%
FX-7600P 2555

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 211% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 72072
+872%
FX-7600P 7418

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 872% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 21375
+499%
FX-7600P 3569

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 499% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 7.93
+107%
FX-7600P 16.4

FX-7600P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX by 107% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 77
+3024%
FX-7600P 2

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 3024% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 15842
+6848%
FX-7600P 228

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 6848% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 286
+281%
FX-7600P 75

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 281% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 3.4
+300%
FX-7600P 0.85

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 300% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 38.4
+2094%
FX-7600P 1.8

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 2094% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 63037
+4102%
FX-7600P 1500

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 4102% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 355
+335%
FX-7600P 82

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 335% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 268
+1420%
FX-7600P 18

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms FX-7600P by 1420% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 100.00 1.66
Recency 19 October 2023 4 June 2014
Physical cores 96 4
Threads 192 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7600P in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while FX-7600P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and FX-7600P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1116 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX or FX-7600P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.