E2-3000M vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1not rated
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.91no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameStorm PeakLlano (2011−2012)
Release date19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999no data
Current price$10927 (1.1x MSRP)$31

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores962 (Dual-core)
Threads1922
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache6 MB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache96 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache384 MB0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeCompute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors78,840 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5FS1
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2SSE4.1/2, 3DNow, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6380G
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 6380G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M.

PCIe version5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 154671
+23054%
E2-3000M 668

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms E2-3000M by 23054% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 7951
+398%
E2-3000M 1597

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms E2-3000M by 398% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 72072
+2291%
E2-3000M 3014

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms E2-3000M by 2291% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2023 20 December 2011
Physical cores 96 2
Threads 192 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while E2-3000M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and E2-3000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
AMD E2-3000M
E2-3000M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1581 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 52 votes

Rate E2-3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX or E2-3000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.