Celeron J1750 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1not rated
Place by popularity10not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameStorm PeakBay Trail-D (2013)
Release date19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999$72
Current price$11150 (1.1x MSRP)$200 (2.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores962 (Dual-core)
Threads1922
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.41 GHz
L1 cache6 MB112 KB
L2 cache96 MB1 MB
L3 cache384 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography5 nm22 nm
Die sizeCompute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
SIPPno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 154674
+25896%
Celeron J1750 595

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX outperforms Celeron J1750 by 25896% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2023 1 September 2013
Physical cores 96 2
Threads 192 2
Cost $9999 $72
Chip lithography 5 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop processor while Celeron J1750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1260 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.