Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1606G by a whopping 3127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 9 | 1887 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.26 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 9.20 | 3.99 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 25 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,349 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 8x 71 mm2 | 209.8 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | sTR5 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 83.25 | 2.58 |
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 25 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 2 |
| Threads | 128 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has a 3126.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Embedded R1606G, on the other hand, has 1300% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
