Athlon 64 3500+ (F3) vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 15 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.54 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 9.16 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Orleans (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (2 years ago) | February 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,349 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 64 3500+ (F3) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 8x 71 mm2 | 103.1 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 64 3500+ (F3) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 59 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 64 3500+ (F3). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 64 3500+ (F3) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 64 3500+ (F3). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and Athlon 64 3500+ (F3).
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 59 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 3500+ (F3), on the other hand, has 493.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX and AMD Athlon 64 3500+ (F3). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 3500+ (F3) is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
