i7-6785R vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 16 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (less than a year ago) | 22 April 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $370 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 33 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 4x 71 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 26,280 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | sTR5 | FCBGA1440 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| eDRAM | no data | 128 MB |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.15 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | N/A |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 22 April 2016 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
i7-6785R, on the other hand, has 438.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-6785R is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Core i7-6785R, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
