Celeron 925 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX outperforms Celeron 925 by a whopping 18171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 44 | 3317 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.39 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 5.65 | 0.31 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | no data |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,649 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 48 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 4x 71 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 26,280 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | sTR5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and Celeron 925.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 51.16 | 0.28 |
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 1 January 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has a 18171.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 925, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 925 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 925 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
