A12-9800E vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX outperforms A12-9800E by a whopping 2305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 68 | 2173 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.23 | 0.54 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 5.65 | 2.35 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (2 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,649 | $105 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has 3276% better value for money than A12-9800E.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 4x 71 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 26,280 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 8 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX and A12-9800E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 46.90 | 1.95 |
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 27 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 4 |
| Threads | 48 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has a 2305% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
A12-9800E, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A12-9800E in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is a server/workstation processor while A12-9800E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
