i3-10100F vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX outperforms Core i3-10100F by a whopping 469% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 209 | 1419 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 18 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.29 | 16.57 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 3.42 | 3.24 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| Release date | 19 October 2023 (2 years ago) | 12 October 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | $122 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has 28% better value for money than i3-10100F.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 13,140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX and Core i3-10100F.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 136 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.36 | 4.98 |
| Recency | 19 October 2023 | 12 October 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has a 469.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
i3-10100F, on the other hand, has 438.5% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-10100F in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
