Athlon II M300 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.35
+14238%
Athlon II M300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX outperforms Athlon II M300 by a whopping 14238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking323183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency8.190.46
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Caspian (2009)
Release date8 March 2022 (3 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1282
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache256 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm45 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketWRX8Socket S1 (S1g3)
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR2
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 57.35
+14238%
Athlon II M300 0.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 95387
+14137%
Athlon II M300 670

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 1943
+812%
Athlon II M300 213

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 16510
+3997%
Athlon II M300 403

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.35 0.40
Recency 8 March 2022 10 September 2009
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has a 14237.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II M300, on the other hand, has 700% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II M300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II M300 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
AMD Athlon II M300
Athlon II M300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1462 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 61 votes

Rate Athlon II M300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon II M300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.