Athlon 700 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 35 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
Power efficiency | 8.21 | no data |
Designer | AMD | AMD |
Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
Release date | 8 March 2022 (3 years ago) | 29 November 1999 (25 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $849 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon 700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 128 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 0.7 GHz |
Multiplier | 27 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 256 MB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 102 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | 70 °C |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 22 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon 700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | WRX8 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 34 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon 700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon 700 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon 700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR1 |
Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and Athlon 700.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 8 March 2022 | 29 November 1999 |
Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
Threads | 128 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 34 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has an age advantage of 22 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 700, on the other hand, has 723.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX and AMD Athlon 700. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 700 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.