Ryzen 3 5425C vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 80 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 6.46 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (4 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Ryzen 3 5425C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Ryzen 3 5425C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | WRX8 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Ryzen 3 5425C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Ryzen 3 5425C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Ryzen 3 5425C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Ryzen 3 5425C.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 March 2022 | 5 May 2022 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Ryzen 3 5425C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 1767% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and AMD Ryzen 3 5425C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5425C is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
