MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 1300T by a whopping 2940% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 73 | 2393 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Mediatek |
| Power efficiency | 16.30 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | no data |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (3 years ago) | 9 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | WRX8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | ARM Mali-G77 MP9 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 42.56 | 1.40 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 8 |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has a 2940% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation processor while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
