EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
43.57
EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
53.06
+21.8%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.72
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency14.1921.50
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplier3820
L1 cache1536 KB4 MB
L2 cache12 MB32 MB
L3 cache128 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm+
Die size4x 81 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors16,600 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketWRX8SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 43.57
EPYC 7713P 53.06
+21.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 66680
EPYC 7713P 81201
+21.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.57 53.06
Recency 8 March 2022 12 January 2021
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has an age advantage of 1 year.

EPYC 7713P, on the other hand, has a 21.8% higher aggregate performance score, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7713P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7713P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 29 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX or EPYC 7713P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.