Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 214 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 10.58 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (3 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | 4500 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | WRX8 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 1 MB + 4 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 March 2022 | 7 January 2018 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 1 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U, on the other hand, has 27900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
