Atom D2500 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX outperforms Atom D2500 by a whopping 19836% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 225 | 3620 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 4.21 | 0.59 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Cedarview (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (4 years ago) | 1 November 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.87 GHz |
| Multiplier | 40 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | 176 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | WRX8 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| AMT | no data | - |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel GMA |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX and Atom D2500.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 4 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.91 | 0.14 |
| Recency | 8 March 2022 | 1 November 2011 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 10 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has a 19836% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 357% more advanced lithography process.
Atom D2500, on the other hand, has 2700% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom D2500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is a server/workstation processor while Atom D2500 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
