EPYC 9634 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.55
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
69.79
+72.1%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.2210.03
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Genoa
Release date14 July 2020 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,304
Current price$2200 $3950 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 82% better value for money than EPYC 9634.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)84
Threads64168
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size74 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,800 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketsWRX8SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 40.55
EPYC 9634 69.79
+72.1%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62720
EPYC 9634 107944
+72.1%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by 72% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.55 69.79
Recency 14 July 2020 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 84
Threads 64 168
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 290 Watt

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a desktop processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.