EPYC 7662 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
2020, $1,149
16 cores / 32 threads, 280 Watt
23.04

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.10no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency3.447.75
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameCastle Peak (2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date14 July 2020 (5 years ago)19 February 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,149no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads32128
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier3920
L1 cache64 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache64 MB256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size2x 74 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors7,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketWRX8Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 23.04
EPYC 7662 41.78
+81.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 39869
Samples: 280
EPYC 7662 72298
+81.3%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.04 41.78
Recency 14 July 2020 19 February 2020
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 128
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX has an age advantage of 4 months.

EPYC 7662, on the other hand, has a 81% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 24% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX and EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.