Athlon XP-M 2100+ vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 366 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 7.27 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Castle Peak (2020) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 14 July 2020 (5 years ago) | 17 March 2004 (21 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $97 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Athlon XP-M 2100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 40 | 12 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 2x 74 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,600 million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Athlon XP-M 2100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | WRX8 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Athlon XP-M 2100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Athlon XP-M 2100+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Athlon XP-M 2100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | 4 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and Athlon XP-M 2100+.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 July 2020 | 17 March 2004 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an age advantage of 16 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2100+, on the other hand, has 1020% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX and AMD Athlon XP-M 2100+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation processor while Athlon XP-M 2100+ is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
