Ultra 9 386H vs Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency24.67no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameShimada Peak (2025)no data
Release date30 July 2025 (less than a year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads128no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nmno data
Die size8x 70.6 mm2no data
Number of transistors66,520 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5no data
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt + 18 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes80no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 64 16

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X has 300% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 386H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Core Ultra 9 386H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 9980X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 386H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Core Ultra 9 386H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.