EPYC 7D13 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 23 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 25.89 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 7.48 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Shimada Peak (2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago) | 10 November 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 7D13 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 36 |
| Threads | 64 | 72 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 0.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 192 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 4x 70.6 mm2 | 6x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,260 million | 24,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 7D13 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | sTR5 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 7D13. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 7D13 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 7D13. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and EPYC 7D13.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 29 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 July 2025 | 10 November 2021 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 36 |
| Threads | 64 | 72 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 95 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
EPYC 7D13, on the other hand, has 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads, and 268.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X and AMD EPYC 7D13. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7D13 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
