Xeon W-1250 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads
40.91
+364%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon W-1250 by 364% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking54786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.304.27
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)no data
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999no data
Current price$1675 (0.8x MSRP)$2251

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 469% better value for money than Xeon W-1250.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB12 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size256 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics P630
Max video memory-64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-1.2 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.91
+364%
Xeon W-1250 8.82

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon W-1250 by 364% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63276
+364%
Xeon W-1250 13639

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon W-1250 by 364% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1636
+10.3%
Xeon W-1250 1483

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon W-1250 by 10% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13989
+134%
Xeon W-1250 5982

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon W-1250 by 134% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.91 8.82
Recency 25 November 2019 1 April 2020
Physical cores 32 6
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 80 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1250 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon W-1250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Intel Xeon W-1250
Xeon W-1250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 19 votes

Rate Xeon W-1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or Xeon W-1250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.