Xeon Max 9460 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 120 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.80 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.42 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (6 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | $8,750 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 40 (Tetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 80 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 97.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 77 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | TR4 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon Max 9460.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 November 2019 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 40 |
| Threads | 64 | 80 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 350 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
Xeon Max 9460, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Intel Xeon Max 9460. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while Xeon Max 9460 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
