Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 5 5600X by 189% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 54 | 464 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 13 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 24.27 | 38.20 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Vermeer (Zen 3) |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 5 November 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | $299 |
| Current price | $1675 (0.8x MSRP) | $268 (0.9x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 5600X has 57% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 5 5600X by 189% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 5 5600X by 189% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3970X by 28% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Ryzen 5 5600X by 62% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.91 | 14.16 |
| Recency | 25 November 2019 | 5 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 6 |
| Threads | 64 | 12 |
| Cost | $1999 | $299 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5600X in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen 5 5600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
