EPYC 4584PX vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.89
+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 4584PX by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.25no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Raphael
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999no data
Current price$1605 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors19,200 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.89
+0.6%
EPYC 4584PX 40.65

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 4584PX by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63241
+0.6%
EPYC 4584PX 62877

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 4584PX by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.89 40.65
Recency 25 November 2019 21 May 2024
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 120 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 4584PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4584PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or EPYC 4584PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.