Xeon Platinum 8351N vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking102not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.18no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)36
Threads4872
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB54 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2933
Maximum memory size256 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 1680
+3.9%
Xeon Platinum 8351N 1617

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 13229
Xeon Platinum 8351N 15233
+15.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 November 2019 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 36
Threads 48 72
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Platinum 8351N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8351N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 8351N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8351N
Xeon Platinum 8351N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8351N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Xeon Platinum 8351N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.