Ryzen Threadripper 1940X vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 107 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.02 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
Power efficiency | 11.68 | no data |
Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 7 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 48 | 28 |
Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 38 | no data |
L1 cache | 1536 KB | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 128 MB | 32 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 23540 Million | 9,600 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | TR4 | SP3r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4 Quad-channel |
Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 November 2019 | 29 July 2017 |
Physical cores | 24 | 14 |
Threads | 48 | 28 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 180 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has an age advantage of 2 years, 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Ryzen Threadripper 1940X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.